Contact a Fantasia Owner Buy or List a Fantasia Post Comments or Questions Large Images & Zip Files Email Webmaster Photos &  Articles Display Art Header

Improved WiFi Reception for your Vessel

 


Go from being able to receive one access point with high packet loss to receiving more than 20 solid high signal strength access points.


The problem with most WiFi receivers is that their interface to your computer is either pcmcia or usb. In both cases there is a severe limitation to the height of your antenna. Here is a solution which uses a Netgear WGE101 802.11g 54 mbps WiFi bridge. This product has Ethernet out allowing the device with antenna to be elevated up to 300 feet! In this application the pcb from the WiFi bridge was installed into a water proof nema enclosure and hoisted it up to within 3 feet of the top of the mast.
 

 

In a standard Ethernet cat 5 cable there are 8 wires and only 4 are used to make a connection. The unused set of four provides DC power to the bridge and is called Power Over Ethernet or POE. The wiring instructions and fabrication of the  POE interface box can be found at the following url http://www.nycwireless.net/poe

The input to this POE box is dc power and the Ethernet connection from your computer. The DC power comes from the AP or Bridge supplied power adapter. The output of the POE box is a cat-5 Ethernet cable spanning up to 300 feet in length. This cable runs to your nema enclosure and now combines the DC power and Ethernet. This therefore means that there is only one cable going to the elevated box.

If your access point or bridge is compatible with the IEEE 802.3af standard one simply plugs the cat-5 cable into the AP or Bridge Ethernet connector. If you do not have a compatible AP or Bridge one simply splits off the DC power and wires it directly to the PCB's dc input power terminals.
The key factor regarding the decision to mount the bridge near the top of the mast relates to the fact that at the 2.4 GHz frequency of the 802.11g WiFi bridge, a significant signal loss in the transmit and receive modes will be experienced with a transmission line in the 60 foot range. When one compares the losses found in a standard WiFi access point with an integrated antenna the total cable loss values may be considered zero. This is because the antenna attached to the access point is about 1 inch from the transceiver.

 

Do not consider installing a high gain mast top 802.11g antenna and locate the bridge or access point down below.


 You therefore will be forced to use a coax cable at least 60 feet in length and will therefore experience significant signal losses. These cable losses reduce the signal energy between the radio base station and the antenna. For example a low loss antenna cable has a loss of 0.23 dB per foot at 2.4 GHz. Standard loss cable is often closer to 1 dB per foot. For cable runs less than roughly 10 feet the default value of 3 dB can be used assuming you are using a top quality (and expensive) coaxial cable type. The bottom line here is why use a coaxial cable where significant signal losses will be present versus using a cat-5 cable to achieve the desired antenna height. The theory supporting the significant signal loss at 2.4 GHz over a 60-foot coaxial cable is as follows. The electrical resistance is in a cable is the result of opposition to the movement of electrons. The power output of a cable can be derived from Ohm's and Watt's laws when the voltage is not alternating (DC current.) When a signal is alternating (at, for example, 2.4 GHz) the moving electrons tend to push away from the core of the conducting cable and move towards the outside of the cable. This is called the skin effect. In essence, it's as though the cable had less cross-sectional area than the area that is actually present. Skin effect causes the current to occupy a smaller cross-sectional area. Consequently, the relative resistance to current flow is greater for alternating current than for direct current. This solution works equally well irrespective of the use of a desktop  or laptop computer within your vessel.

 

This solution has worked so well one must consider mounting the nema enclosed WiFi bridge permanently to the top of the mast.

 

The first time this unit was powered up the elevated bridge  was able to receive more than 20 access points.

A proper instillation shall involve the fabrication of a custom enclosure with the same footprint as ones  existing mast top cap. All of the existing lights and transducers currently mounted up there with the addition of the WiFi antenna will then be mounted a little higher and on top of the enclosure assembly. It will be designed light weight and such that access to the WiFi pcb, if necessary,  can be achieved without moving anything else mount on the enclosure.

 

 Click on image to enlarge
 

 

BOAT INFORMATION    OWNER DIRECTORY     BOATS FOR SALE   FORUM    UPLOAD  DOWNLOAD    CONTACT

HOME